Anthony Richardson, Josh Allen, and the danger of drafting inaccurate QBs
Jan 26, 2023 - 4:00 PMIn my recent piece on the value of drafting a quarterback, I was surprised to see that many readers suggested targeting Anthony Richardson in the first round. This was unexpected to me because I simply don’t see it with the former Florida Gators passer. To be fair, I thought the same thing about Josh Allen when he was coming out of Wyoming. Obviously, Allen has turned into one of the most explosive players in the NFL, but he didn’t start out that way. As you may recall, it took two full seasons for the former Cowboy to reach his current level of play. Here is a blurb from Allen’s scouting report leading up to the draft:
“Likely be the biggest boom-or-bust quarterback prospect in the draft. Allen’s size and arm talent are prototypical for early first-round picks, but it’s rare to find a quarterback with such a low college completion rate become a successful pro. Allen’s receivers struggled to separate, but there were plenty of times where his lack of anticipation and post-snap plan did him in. Allen can make some truly special throws, but his ability to improve the mental part of his game will determine whether he’s a good NFL starter or just another big, strong-armed guy.”
For comparison, here is a similar snippet on Richardson:
“Big and highly athletic arm talent specimen. Legitimately designed run game brilliance to his game. Scrambling is good, too. Reads field well for being a young QB but not an ultra-quick processor yet. When he’s patient, he will move from read to read across the entire field. At times vacates the pocket too early when it’s unnecessary. Somewhat raw prospect but has All-Pro upside.”
You can see some very similar statements, particularly around the “mental” or “processing” aspects of the game. Nobody doubted Allen’s arm and athleticism, and the same can be said for Richardson. However, I think we should look at Josh Allen as an outlier, and not the norm. As the report above noted, the current Buffalo Bills star had noted accuracy problems in college. In fact, he and Richardson’s stats in their final collegiate season are remarkably similar. You can ignore the Pro Football Focus grades if you want, but look at the Adjusted Completion percentage.
Josh Allen and Anthony Richardson in their final college seasons. I am thinking that most people that are high on Richardson are hoping for a similar trajectory, but it should be noted that Allen is an exception... inaccurate passers in college rarely become accurate in the NFL. pic.twitter.com/zUvZtRIumF
— Diane Taylor ️⚧️ (@SeaDeeTaylor) January 25, 2023
Only one quarterback has a worse Adj% than Anthony Richardson since 2016 (Hasaan Klugh), and no QB below the 70% mark has made a significant impact in the NFL, or even become a successful starter... with the exception of Josh Allen. Of course, you could point to the flip side of this argument; even a lot of accurate passers in college don’t translate to the NFL. Zach Wilson is a great example; he ranked 4th in his class — behind Justin Fields and Mac Jones. The jury may still be out on Fields and Jones, but at least they are expected to be the starter for the respective teams next season. I bring this up because I think it is important to acknowledge that there isn’t one particular stat that is predictive of success in the NFL for quarterbacks. However, lack of accuracy does seem to be fairly predictive of lack of success as a pro.
Josh Allen represents both the risk and reward of going after a “high upside” prospect who is still a work in progress. We will never know if he would have reached the same level of stardom in another situation, but we do know that he has become a game changing player with the Bills. Anthony Richardson could follow this trajectory as well, although that is a lot to bank on, particularly for a franchise like the Seattle Seahawks, which refuses to enter “rebuilding mode.”
A case could be made for drafting a developmental quarterback if the team is able to bring Geno Smith back next season; perhaps sitting behind 2022’s most accurate passer would be exactly what a young signal caller would need to develop the mechanics and diagnostics required to be a pro. However, this just seems like a lot to bank on, and even for his true believers out there, I think that most would agree that Anthony Richardson’s game needs some fine tuning before he becomes the face of a franchise. I wish him the best luck in his career and hope that he finds success in the NFL... I just don’t want the Seattle Seahawks to be the ones who decide to take on a project passer with one of their first round picks.
Which, by chance, also means I hope they don’t draft Will Levis.
Be the first!
Related News
- Seahawks by the Numbers : Stacks of sacks, and other fun math Dec 26
- Pre-Snap Reads 12/26: Seahawks Holiday weekend review Dec 26
- ‘Monday Night Football’ picks and open thread: Ravens at 49ers Dec 25
- NFL on Christmas open thread: Raiders at Chiefs, Giants at Eagles Dec 25
- Inside the Hawks’ best drive of 2023 Dec 25
- NFL Opening Odds, Week 17: Seahawks open as field goal favorites against Steelers Dec 25
- Post-Snap Reads 12/25: Seahawks rally for huge road win in Tennessee Dec 25
- Broncos, Saints on their way to giving Seahawks better draft pick Dec 25
- Winners and Losers from Seahawks 20, Titans 17 Dec 24
- Cigar Thoughts, Game 15: It’s So Over / We’re So Back, Part II Dec 24
- Let’s ride! Patriots at Broncos open thread Dec 24
- Geno Smith, Drew Lock just made NFL history with game-winning drives Dec 24